Fewer frauds, bigger losses: what the RBI's FY26 numbers tell boards
Reported cases fell by more than half while the value reported rose by almost half. The lesson is not that fraud is shrinking, but that it is concentrating where diligence is weakest.
The Reserve Bank of India's Annual Report for 2025-26 records 10,114 fraud cases reported by banks and financial institutions, down from 23,722 the year before. The value of those frauds moved the other way: ₹48,021 crore, against ₹32,803 crore in FY25.
Two features of the data matter more than the headline. First, loans dominate: advances-related frauds accounted for 8,640 cases and ₹40,774 crore, about 85% of the total value. Second, the total includes 314 older cases worth ₹30,199 crore that were re-examined and re-classified after the Supreme Court's March 2023 judgment requiring that borrowers be heard before an account is declared fraudulent.
What the numbers mean in practice
- Card and digital-payment frauds fell sharply in count, which shows that controls on high-volume, low-value channels are working.
- Large-value fraud is still concentrated in credit, where a single borrower group can divert hundreds of crores through related entities before a red flag is raised.
- Due process now shapes the evidence. A fraud classification has to rest on a record that survives the borrower's response, so forensic work must be built to evidential standard from day one.
Where diligence fails
In our experience the same patterns recur: borrower groups whose real ownership sits behind nominee directors, end-use certificates that nobody tests, collateral valued on documents rather than site visits, and early-warning signals that sit in separate systems. None of these is solved by more paperwork. They are solved by independent verification of who the borrower really is and where the money really went.
Assurance should begin before disbursement and continue after it. Most losses happen in the gap between the two.
Questions for the board and the credit committee
- For our top exposures, has anyone independently mapped the borrower group's related parties?
- Do our end-use checks include site and stock verification, or only certificates?
- Are our fraud examinations built to survive the borrower's right to be heard?
- Do our lenders' assurance and ASM reports reach the committee in time to act?
Sources
- Outlook Business, citing the RBI Annual Report 2025-26, Financial institutions report over 10,000 cases of fraud involving ₹48,000 crore in FY26, May 2026.
Facing a similar question? Speak to the partner who leads this work.
More from The BDI Lookout.
Mule accounts: the RBI wants suspect money held before it moves
A draft procedure gives banks one way to place temporary debit holds, with a 60-day ceiling and a duty to explain. Telecom risk scores have already kept more than ₹5,000 crore in victims' accounts.
Video KYC is only as strong as the checks behind the call
The RBI's consolidated KYC Directions spell out what a remote onboarding has to prove. Rented identities and spoofed video test every one of those safeguards.
Hawala has gone digital, and it enters through ordinary accounts
A September 2026 FATF report finds underground banking among the main professional money-laundering channels in more than 80% of reporting jurisdictions. Its entry and exit points are bank accounts, fintech wallets and stablecoins.